From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clawson v. Holesclaw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at GREENEVILLE
Mar 29, 2012
NO. 2:11-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 2:11-CV-98

03-29-2012

JOSHUA DEAN CLAWSON v. JOE HOLESCLAW, JOHNATHAN KING, JAMES FRITZ, TOM SMITH, and BILLY HAREL


Mattice/Lee


MEMORANDUM

This is a prisoner's pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The form complaint, which was signed by plaintiff, contained a notice and a warning—the former advising him that he was responsible for keeping the Court informed of any address change and the latter cautioning him that his failure to provide his correct address within ten [10] days of any address change would result in the dismissal of his case.

Despite the notice and the warning, a copy of a deficiency order entered in this lawsuit was mailed to plaintiff at the address he listed as his current address in his complaint and then mailed to an alternate address, also listed in his complaint. However, each was returned to the Court by the postal authorities more than ten days ago, marked, "RTS (Return to Sender), No Longer Here" and "Not Here," (Docs. 2, 4). Obviously, without plaintiff's correct address, neither the Court nor the defendants can communicate with him regarding his case.

Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED by separate order for plaintiff's failure to prosecute his claims. See Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

ENTER:

____________________

HARRY S. MATTICE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clawson v. Holesclaw

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at GREENEVILLE
Mar 29, 2012
NO. 2:11-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Clawson v. Holesclaw

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA DEAN CLAWSON v. JOE HOLESCLAW, JOHNATHAN KING, JAMES FRITZ, TOM…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE at GREENEVILLE

Date published: Mar 29, 2012

Citations

NO. 2:11-CV-98 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 29, 2012)