From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clauss v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-03330-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-03330-AP

03-19-2012

GLORIA A. CLAUSS, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

For Plaintiff: Anthony L. Sokolow, PC For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United Stated Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado M. Thayne Warner Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Council Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPERANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Anthony L. Sokolow, PC

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United Stated Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

District of Colorado

M. Thayne Warner

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Assistant Regional Council

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: December 20, 2011
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: December 28, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 27, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of his knowledge, Counsel for Defense states that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Counsel for Plaintiff previously obtained additional evidence intended for filing with the Appeals Council. The Appeals Council issued the decision denying a review of the claim before the evidence could be submitted. The proposed new evidence is a Medical Opinion Statement regarding the severity of the Claimant's impairment(s). Counsel for Plaintiff will submit a separate Motion requesting admission of additional evidence.
The Counsel for Plaintiff has consulted with Counsel for Defense regarding the submission of this new evidence and he has stated that he opposes the admission of this evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES.

Counsel for Plaintiff States: To the best of his knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.
Counsel for Defense States: To the best of his knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

There are no other matters anticipated.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 7, 2012
Counsel for Plaintiff is aware that this date is more than 40 days from the date of the Defendant's Answer but Counsel for Plaintiff has discussed the additional time needed and Counsel for Defendant has no objections to this extension of the time for filing of the Opening Brief. OK as per JLK. No extensions absent extreme circumstances.
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:
June 6, 2012
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due:
June 21, 2012

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement:
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement:
Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. (X)All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. () All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH DC. COLO. LCiv 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended

only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L . Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

_________________

Anthony L. Sokolow,

Attorney for Plaintiff

_________________

By: M. Thayne Warner

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Clauss v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 19, 2012
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-03330-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Clauss v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA A. CLAUSS, Plaintiff v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No.: 11-cv-03330-AP (D. Colo. Mar. 19, 2012)