From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clausen v. Virginia Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 8, 1971
179 S.E.2d 463 (Va. 1971)

Opinion

42444 Record No. 7293.

March 8, 1971

Present, All the Justices.

Automobiles — Negligence — Right Turn.

Statute requires right turn as close as practicable to right-hand curb. Plaintiff made right turn on left side of cutoff road, adjacent to defendant's bus which was in right-hand lane of cutoff. Not error to strike plaintiff's evidence on ground of negligence which effectively contributed to cause the accident.

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Hon. Clyde H. Jacob, judge presiding.

Affirmed.

Augustus Anninos (Howell, Anninos Daugherty, on brief), for plaintiff in error.

William T. Prince (E. Milton Farley, III; Williams, Worrell, Kelly Worthington; Hinton, Williams, Gay, Powell Gibson, on brief), for defendant in error.


Plaintiff, Christian D. Clausen, brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from a collision between the car he was driving and a bus of defendant Virginia Transit Company. The collision occurred in the vicinity of the "X" mark superimposed on the sketch on the following page.

Both the plaintiff's car and the defendant's bus turned right from Taussig Boulevard into the cutoff leading to Granby Street. When they reached Granby Street, the bus was on the right-hand side of the cutoff and the plaintiff's car was on the left-hand side adjacent to the bus. The plaintiff's car crossed into the inside or eastern lane of Granby Street, headed south. According to the plaintiff's evidence, the bus first headed south in the outside or western lane of Granby

* * * * * * * * * * * *

An illustration appears at this point in the published volume. Call Geronimo Tech Support at (800) 457-6045 if you wish to have us fax it to you.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Street, but moved to the left, striking the plaintiff's car in the inside or eastern lane of travel.

The trial judge struck the plaintiff's evidence and entered summary judgment for the defendant, holding that the plaintiff had violated Code Sec. 46.1-215, which provides:

"Sec. 46.1-215. Required position and method of turning at intersections; local regulations. — The driver of a vehicle intending to turn at an intersection or other location on any highway . . . shall do so as follows:

(a) Right turn: Both the approach for a right turn and a right turn shall be made as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway.

"* * *

"(d) Local authorities having the power to regulate traffic in their respective jurisdictions may cause markers, buttons, or signs to be placed within or adjacent to intersections and thereby require and direct that a different course from that specified in this section be traveled by vehicles turning at any intersection, and when markers, buttons, or signs are so placed no driver of a vehicle shall turn a vehicle at an intersection other than as directed and required by such markers, buttons or signs."

According to the record in this case, there was no marker, button or sign directing the plaintiff, when turning to the right and onto Granby Street, to follow a different course from that specified in paragraph (a) of Code Sec. 46.1-215. The plaintiff therefore violated Code Sec. 46.1-215, and consequently was negligent, when he failed to approach and make the right turn "as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway" as required by paragraph (a). Under the evidence, such negligence efficiently contributed to cause the accident. Therefore the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence which barred recovery, and the court correctly entered summary judgment for the defendant.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Clausen v. Virginia Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia
Mar 8, 1971
179 S.E.2d 463 (Va. 1971)
Case details for

Clausen v. Virginia Transit Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN D. CLAUSEN v. VIRGINIA TRANSIT COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Mar 8, 1971

Citations

179 S.E.2d 463 (Va. 1971)
179 S.E.2d 463