Opinion
No. 09-3618.
Submitted: June 3, 2010.
Filed: June 7, 2010.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
Craig A. Peterson, Peterson Law Office, Fargo, ND, for Appellant.
Sarah Andrews Herman, Matthew A. Kipp, Dorsey Whitney, Fargo, ND, for Appellees.
Before LOKEN, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
[UNPUBLISHED]
Eric Clausen appeals the district court's adverse grant of judgment on the pleadings in his Title IX and state law action.
The HONORABLE DANIEL L. HOVLAND, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota.
Following careful de novo review of the record, see Clemons v. Crawford, 585 F.3d 1119, 1124 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude that Clausen failed to state a Title IX claim of gender discrimination or retaliation, and failed to plead a claim of actual or constructive fraud under North Dakota law. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.