From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clauder v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2016
ED CV 14-2011 PA (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2016)

Opinion

ED CV 14-2011 PA (JCx)

01-11-2016

SAMUEL CLAUDER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; GARY PENROD; and MICHAEL PELKEY, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's January 11, 2016 Minute Order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants County of San Bernardino, Gary Penrod, and Michael Pelkey (collectively "Defendants"), which granted summary judgment to Defendants on the claims asserted by plaintiff Samuel Clauder ("Plaintiff"),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall have judgment in their favor against Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. . . . . . . . . . . . .

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 11, 2016

/s/_________

Percy Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clauder v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2016
ED CV 14-2011 PA (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Clauder v. Cnty. of San Bernardino

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL CLAUDER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; GARY PENROD; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2016

Citations

ED CV 14-2011 PA (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2016)

Citing Cases

Cross v. Cent. Contra Costa Transit Auth.

CCCTA argues the motion is more appropriately analyzed as a modification of the Court's scheduling order…