From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claude Neon Federal Co. v. Meyer Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Nov 27, 1933
151 So. 139 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 14532.

November 27, 1933.

Appeal from First City Court of New Orleans; W. Alex. Bahns, Judge.

On application for rehearing.

Application returned to counsel without being considered.

For former opinion, see 150 So. 410.

Miller, Bloch Martin and T.J. Martin, all of New Orleans, for petitioner.


In our opinion, Act No. 16 of 1910 requires applications for rehearings in cases appealed from the First city court of the city of New Orleans to be filed before the sixth day. This application, having been presented to the clerk of this court for filing on November 13, 1933, or 14 days after the case was decided, comes too late. Valmont Service Station v. Avegno, 3 La. App. 335; O. K. Realty Co. v. Juliani, Inc., 157 La. 277, 102 So. 399; Yazoo Miss. Valley R. Co. v. Marx Sons, 17 La. App. 172, 135 So. 675, decided July 1, 1931.

Consequently, for the reasons herein given, the application for rehearing presented on behalf of Claude Neon Federal Company, Inc., plaintiff and appellant, is hereby ordered returned to counsel without having been considered by this court.


Summaries of

Claude Neon Federal Co. v. Meyer Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans
Nov 27, 1933
151 So. 139 (La. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Claude Neon Federal Co. v. Meyer Bros., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDE NEON FEDERAL CO., Inc., v. MEYER BROS., Inc

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans

Date published: Nov 27, 1933

Citations

151 So. 139 (La. Ct. App. 1933)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Douglass Life Ins. Co.

In Valmont Service Station v. Avegno, 3 La. App. 335, we said, with reference to the act of 1921, that that…

Doskey v. United Theatres

PER CURIAM. The application for rehearing is not considered having been filed too late. Valmont Service Sta.…