From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 15, 2019
No. 76212-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 76212-COA

02-15-2019

ANTHONY CLARKE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Anthony Clarke appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on March 14, 2018, as well as supplemental pleadings filed on March 28, 2018, April 2, 2018, and April 25, 2018. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3). --------

Clarke contends the district court erred by construing his pleadings as postconviction habeas petitions when he filed them pursuant to NRS 34.360. Clarke's pleadings below challenged the jurisdiction of the district court on numerous bases. The district court's order does not clearly construe Clarke's pleadings as a first, timely postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Rather, the district court concluded Clarke failed to allege any grounds that, if true, would entitle him to relief. We agree that Clarke failed to demonstrate any basis for granting relief under NRS 34.360. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; NRS 171.010; Landreth v. Malik, 127 Nev. 175, 183, 251 P.3d 163, 168 (2011) ("Subject matter jurisdiction is the court's authority to render a judgment in a particular category of case." (internal quotation marks omitted)). Clarke is being restrained pursuant to a judgment of conviction filed on January 24, 2018. To the extent Clarke challenges the validity of his guilty plea or the resulting judgment of conviction, such claims must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See NRS 34.724(2)(b).

Clarke also contends the district court failed to address his claims that the Nevada Department of Corrections was improperly calculating his time served. Clarke did not raise this argument in his petition below, and we decline to consider it on appeal in the first instance. McNelton v. State, 115 Nev. 396, 416, 990 P.2d 1263, 1276 (1999).

For the foregoing reasons, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, A.C.J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge

Anthony Clarke

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Clarke v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Feb 15, 2019
No. 76212-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Clarke v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CLARKE, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

No. 76212-COA (Nev. App. Feb. 15, 2019)