From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Sec. King Int'l

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2022
22 Civ. 5082 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 5082 (JPC)

09-20-2022

ROY CLARKE, On Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. SECURITY KING INTERNATIONAL, LLC, BEE AMATO, and AKIVA “DOE”, Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff Roy Clarke filed the Complaint in this action on June 16, 2022, Dkt. 1, but the docket reflects that the Complaint was never served on Defendants Bee Amato and Akiva Doe. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a defendant to be served with the summons and complaint within 90 days after the complaint is filed.

Plaintiff must file a letter advising the Court why Plaintiff has failed to serve the summons and Complaint within the 90-day period on Defendants Bee Amato and Akiva Doe, or, if those Defendants have been served, when and in what manner such service was made. If the Court does not receive a letter by September 27, 2022, showing good cause why such service was not made within the 90 days, the Court will dismiss the case against Defendants Bee Amato and Akiva Doe.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clarke v. Sec. King Int'l

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 20, 2022
22 Civ. 5082 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Clarke v. Sec. King Int'l

Case Details

Full title:ROY CLARKE, On Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 5082 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 20, 2022)