Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

CLARKE v. RICHCO CONS

486 Mich. 1071 (Mich. 2010)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
CLARKE v. RICHCO CONS

1 Citing case

  1. Lawrencem Clarke, Inc v. Richco

    489 Mich. 265 (Mich. 2011)   Cited 81 times
    In Lawrence M. Clarke, Inc. v. Richco Const. Inc., 489 Mich. 265, 278-79, 803 N.W.2d 151, 159 (2011), the court held that "substitute service must be reasonably certain to inform those affected and the means employed to notify interested parties must be more than a mere gesture; they must be means that one who actually desires to inform the interested parties might reasonably employ to accomplish actual notice."

    Defendants sought leave to appeal in this Court, and this Court ordered oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. Lawrence M Clarke, Inc v Richco Constr, Inc, 486 Mich 1071 (2010). II. STANDARD OF REVIEW