From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Okafor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2014
Case No. CV 11-6129-FMO (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-6129-FMO (RNB)

05-08-2014

TIMOTHY CLARKE, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTINE OKAFOR, Defendant.


I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS SERVED BY FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE PREPAID, TO ALL COUNSEL (OR PARTIES) AT THEIR RESPECTIVE MOST RECENT ADDRESS OF RECORD IN THIS ACTION ON THIS DATE.

____________

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and (2) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

___________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clarke v. Okafor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2014
Case No. CV 11-6129-FMO (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Clarke v. Okafor

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY CLARKE, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTINE OKAFOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 11-6129-FMO (RNB) (C.D. Cal. May. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Nordenstrom v. Corizon Health, Inc.

As a “convicted prisoner” the Eighth Amendment applies to his claim. Id.; see also Flores v. Cty. of Fresno,…