From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clarke v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

November 13, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Dismiss Pleading.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., WISNER, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint reinstated.

Memorandum:

Although the complaint was subject to dismissal based on plaintiff's failure to comply with CPLR 304, defendant failed to object to the defective filing either in his initial answer or in his cross motion to dismiss. Thus, Supreme Court erred in sua sponte dismissing the complaint on that ground ( see, Matter of Fry v. Village of Tarrytown, 89 N.Y.2d 714, 723; Venditti v. Town of Alden, 239 A.D.2d 910). The court also erred in determining that the complaint was subject to dismissal based on plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirement in CPLR former 306-b (a) concerning the filing of proof of service. By appearing in the action before the time period provided in former 306-b (a) expired and failing to raise an objection in his answer, defendant has waived his objection to the filing requirement ( see, Nardi v. Hirsh, 250 A.D.2d 361, 363).


Summaries of

Clarke v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Clarke v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE CLARKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES L. DAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 830

Citing Cases

Snow v. SRE Wellness, Inc.

Given that admission, SRE has have waived any objection to Snow's alleged failure to comply with the filing…

In the Matter of Grasso

Thereafter, the respondent appeared and litigated the petition on the merits. Here, by answering the petition…