Clark v. Yates

Full title: MARY CLARK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN YATES, in his individual and official…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01480-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01480-RPM

11-20-2012

MARY CLARK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN YATES, in his individual and official capacity as an Aurora Police Officer, and CITY OF AURORA, Defendants.

Cheryl L. Trine Marc Colin Peter R. Morales Jonathan M. Watson

Richard P. Matsch

Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Cheryl L. Trine

Marc Colin

Peter R. Morales

Jonathan M. Watson

COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Motion for IME

10:23 a.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks. Ms. Trine answers questions asked by the Court regarding the accuracy of the exhibits attached to the defendants' motion. Argument by Ms. Trine.

ORDERED: Motion for Independent Medical Examination [26], is granted.

Mr. Watson answers questions asked by the Court regarding the expert who will conduct the examination and where it will be held. Ms. Trine states she has no objection to the qualifications of defendants' expert. Court states counsel should confer regarding scheduling of the examination.

10:30 a.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 7 min.