From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Warner

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jun 16, 1926
109 So. 296 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Decision Filed June 16, 1926.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; A. J. Rose, Judge.

Kurtz Reed, for Plaintiff in Error;

C. L. Brown, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein granting a new trial, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order granting a new trial; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. Warner

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Jun 16, 1926
109 So. 296 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Clark v. Warner

Case Details

Full title:WILBERT CLARK, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF ROYAL PALM AUTO…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Jun 16, 1926

Citations

109 So. 296 (Fla. 1926)
109 So. 296