From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 4, 2019
Case No. 3:18-cv-266 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 4, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-266

01-04-2019

ANTHONY CLARK, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Lebanon Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Second Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 17), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Second Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. January 4, 2019.

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Clark v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 4, 2019
Case No. 3:18-cv-266 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Clark v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CLARK, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Lebanon Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 4, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-266 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 4, 2019)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Union Railroad Co.

There it was held that if one negligently frightens the horse of another, which thereupon runs away and comes…