From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Volpe

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 10, 1972
461 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1631.

July 10, 1972.

Richard M. Troy, Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kent Frizzell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., John R. Schupp, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., George R. Hyde, Dirk D. Snel, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Secretary of Transportation.

Norman L. Sisson, Robert J. Jones, Howard P. Elliott, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for Dept. of Highways of the State of La.

Ralph L. Kaskell, Jr., of Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., for Boh Bros. Construction Co., Inc., R. Emmett Kerrigan, Charles K. Reasonover, New Orleans, La., of counsel.

David S. Cressy, Deputy City Atty., New Orleans, La., for City of New Orleans.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; R. Blake West, Judge.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GODBOLD and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.


This is a class action in which plaintiffs seek to enjoin the construction, already in progress when suit was filed, of Interstate Highway 610 through City Park in the City of New Orleans. Suit was filed February 24, 1972, and on March 21, 1972, after an evidentiary hearing confined to the issue of laches, the court dismissed the action by application of the doctrine of laches. Its reasons for judgment are set forth in 342 F. Supp. 1324.

The decision of the District Court must be, and is, affirmed. Ragland v. Mueller, 460 F.2d 1196 [5th Cir., 1972.]


Summaries of

Clark v. Volpe

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jul 10, 1972
461 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Clark v. Volpe

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT CLARK ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN A. VOLPE, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jul 10, 1972

Citations

461 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Daingerfield Island Protective Soc. v. Lujan

The defense of laches, we hold, must be rejected under the circumstances this case presents. Counsel for the…