Clark v. Value Options, Inc.

Full title: Shannon Michael Clark, Plaintiff, v. Value Options, Inc., et al.…

Court: United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Dec 14, 2005

No. CIV 03-1344-PHX-EHC (MS) (D. Ariz. Dec. 14, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV 03-1344-PHX-EHC (MS).

December 14, 2005

ORDER

EARL CARROLL, Senior District Judge

On September 6, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend his Complaint a third time to add 17 new Defendants and a new claim. (Dkt. 143). Defendant Value Options, Inc. (Defendant) filed a Response (Dkt. 144), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Dkt. 149). On October 31, 2005, Magistrate Judge Morton Sitver issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 165) regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Amend. Plaintiff filed an Objection (Dkt. 168) and Defendant a Response (Dkt. 173).

Standard of Review

A district court judge reviews de novo the Report and Recommendation of a Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Discussion

The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, including the Objections filed by Petitioner, adopts in full the Report and Recommendations filed October 31, 2005, and incorporates the same as a part of this Order. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge is adopted in full. (Dkt 165).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is DENIED. (Dkt. 143).