From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Nov 6, 2008
No. CIV 08-331-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV 08-331-JHP-SPS.

November 6, 2008


OPINION AND ORDER


Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons who is incarcerated at the Florence Federal Correctional Complex in Florence, Colorado, has filed a "motion for order to the Federal Bureau of Prisons to provide [plaintiff] his mental health medication" [Docket #1]. He alleges he needs certain psychotropic medications, but the Federal Bureau of Prisons no longer has the medications in its formulary. He claims he has been advised that the only way he can receive the medication is by a court order. The court construes plaintiff's motion liberally, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), as a complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

The record shows that plaintiff is incarcerated in the District of Colorado, where he allegedly is being denied his prescription medication. Because proper venue does not lie in this district, see 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Clark v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Nov 6, 2008
No. CIV 08-331-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Clark v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAMES CLARK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 6, 2008

Citations

No. CIV 08-331-JHP-SPS (E.D. Okla. Nov. 6, 2008)