Summary
In Clark v. Sewell, 3 Atk. 96, where the payment was postponed one month only after the testator's death, Lord Hardwicke said that that was a circumstance that the plaintiff had a right to lay hold of to take that out of the cases that had been deemed a satisfaction.
Summary of this case from Silvers v. JonesOpinion
April, 1933.
Present — McAvoy, Martin, O'Malley and Townley, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. No opinion.