From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Tiger Admin

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
3:23-cv-00171-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00171-LPR

07-08-2024

VERNA CLARK ADC #712557, PLAINTIFF v. TIGER ADMIN, Law Enforcement Officer Trumann, AR, et al., DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

LEE P. RUDOFSKY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Consistent with the Order that was entered today and prior Orders in this case, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that all claims in this case are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment or any related Orders would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Clark v. Tiger Admin

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
3:23-cv-00171-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Clark v. Tiger Admin

Case Details

Full title:VERNA CLARK ADC #712557, PLAINTIFF v. TIGER ADMIN, Law Enforcement Officer…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-00171-LPR (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)