From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Thomas

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 12, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF.

October 12, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court on November 30, 2009 and an Amended Complaint was filed August 19, 2010. Defendant filed his Answer (#36) on August 22, 2011. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than October 24, 2011 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.


Summaries of

Clark v. Thomas

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 12, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN THOMAS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF (D. Nev. Oct. 12, 2011)