From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 2011
54 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4D10-1034.

January 26, 2011. Rehearing Denied March 14, 2011.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-2849 CF10A.

Walter Clark, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the trial court's order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant claimed that his prior offenses for which the court withheld adjudication of guilt and placed him on probation do not qualify as predicate offenses for habitual felony offender (HFO) sentencing. Appellant is wrong. At the time appellant committed the offense for which he received the HFO sentence, the relevant section of the HFO statute provided: "For the purposes of this section, the placing of a person on probation or community control without an adjudication of guilt shall be treated as a prior conviction." § 775.084(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); see also ch. 99-188, § 3, Laws of Fla. (effective July 1, 1999).

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 14, 2011
54 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:Walter CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 14, 2011

Citations

54 So. 3d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Turner v. State

Affirmed. See § 775.084(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Teal v. State,…

Roman v. State

PER CURIAM.Affirmed. See§ 775.084(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); Clark v. State, 54 So.3d 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).…