From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 5, 2009
281 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. WD69683.

May 5, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay County, Michael J. Maloney, Judge.

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before DIV III: HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judges.


ORDER


Maurice Clark appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Clark argues that his plea counsel was ineffective in that the information upon which he was charged was insufficient, and that the plea court failed to establish a factual basis for his guilty plea. Because Clark has established no right to an evidentiary hearing and because none of his claims warrant relief, the motion court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 5, 2009
281 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Clark v. State

Case Details

Full title:Maurice D. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

281 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)