containers of beers in a cooler on the front passenger side floorboard; those four cans of beer were then introduced into evidence. Thus, the State presented evidence that, if believed by the jury, indicated that Pope was in possession of beer, a prohibited beverage in Morgan County. See, e.g., Clark v. State, 53 Ala.App. 495, 301 So.2d 258 (Crim.App. 1974) (distinguished from Blackwell where the witness handled one of the beer bottles in front of the jury and the jury was given the opportunity to examine all of the bottles). Therefore, Pope is not entitled to any relief on this claim.

We have held to the contrary as respects "dry counties" in Alabama when the quantity exceeds the exceptions spelled out in Title 29, Section 262, supra. Hughes v. State, 52 Ala. App. 244, 291 So.2d 331; Clark v. State, 53 Ala. App. 495, 301 So.2d 258; Johnston v. State, 54 Ala. App. 100, 304 So.2d 918; Graham v. State, 45 Ala. App. 79, 224 So.2d 905. Where there is a reasonable inference to prove the existence of the corpus delicti, the Court must submit to the jury for consideration the question of the sufficiency and the weight of the evidence tending to support that inference.