From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Shepherd

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 22, 1920
46 Cal.App. 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3306.

March 22, 1920.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Alfred H. McAdoo for Petitioners.


[1] This is an application for a writ of mandamus. The application is based upon private rights only. The matters to be litigated are not publici juris. Nor does it appear that some peculiar emergency or exigency exists such as would justify the issuance of the writ by this court in the first instance. The petition shows no sufficient reason why the application should not have been made to the superior court, and the application for the writ is therefore denied.


Summaries of

Clark v. Shepherd

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Mar 22, 1920
46 Cal.App. 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
Case details for

Clark v. Shepherd

Case Details

Full title:S. N. CLARK et al., Petitioners, v. L. E. SHEPHERD et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Mar 22, 1920

Citations

46 Cal.App. 677 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920)
189 P. 725