From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Sheets

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 8, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-1018 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-1018.

September 8, 2010


ORDER


On July 20, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. (Doc. # 10.) The Magistrate Judge advised the parties of the right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of the failure to do so. (Doc. # 10, at 25.) The Magistrate Judge also granted Petitioner an extension of time to file objections. (Doc. # 13.) No objections have been filed.

This Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this action. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action on the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clark v. Sheets

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 8, 2010
Case No. 2:08-cv-1018 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Clark v. Sheets

Case Details

Full title:RONALD CLARK, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL SHEETS, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-1018 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 8, 2010)

Citing Cases

Griffin v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst.

The Sixth Amendment does not guarantee the defendant a 'meaningful relationship' with his attorney." Clark v.…