Opinion
21-cv-10451
09-23-2022
Chirece Clark, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner Andrew Saul,[1] Defendant.
Anthony P. Patti Mag. Judge
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18], GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12], AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16]
JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge
This is a Social Security appeal. Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's report and recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 18) recommending the Court grant Plaintiff Chirece Clark's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12), deny Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16), and remand the matter to the Commissioner for further action. The parties were required to file specific written objections to the R&R within fourteen days of service. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless thoroughly reviewed the R&R and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The R&R (ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED;
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED;
Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16) is DENIED; and
The findings of the Commissioner are REVERSED AND REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the R&R.
By failing to object to the R&R, the parties have waived any further right of appeal. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005).
IT IS SO ORDERED.