Summary
finding that the plaintiff's § 1985 and other claims were barred by the statutes of limitations because his action was brought ten years after the underlining events occurred and the longest applicable limitations period was four years
Summary of this case from Gregory v. BruceOpinion
No. 12-1489
08-24-2012
JOHN R. CLARK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERNON RUSSELL; LAW FIRM OF PLUMMER, BELO & RUSSELL, PA; FOOTLOCKER, INC., Defendants - Appellees.
John R. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Booth, III, Gabrielle Amber Pittman, SHARPLESS & STAVOLA, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina; Kerry Anne Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA) Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John R. Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Booth, III, Gabrielle Amber Pittman, SHARPLESS & STAVOLA, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina; Kerry Anne Shad, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John R. Clark appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Russell, No. 1:11-cv-00526-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED