From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Rachfal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

MOTION NO. (405/22) CA 21-00235

11-10-2022

Geraldine CLARK and Moses Clark, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v. Stephan J. RACHFAL, M.D., Defendant, John Cucinotta, M.D., Crouse Radiology Associates, LLP, Defendants-Appellants, Crouse Hospital Emergency Medicine Department, Crouse Health Hospital, Inc. and Krista J. Kandel, M.D., Defendants-Respondents.


Motion for reargument be and the same hereby is granted in part and, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered July 8, 2022 (207 A.D.3d 1173, 171 N.Y.S.3d 710 [4th Dept. 2022] ) is amended by deleting the second and third sentences of the sixth paragraph of the memorandum and substituting the following sentences: "Dr. Kandel permitted plaintiff to leave the hospital while a review of her brain MRI was pending. Plaintiffs’ expert opined that discharging plaintiff before a review of the scans was complete constituted a deviation from the standard of care in light of plaintiff's medical history, which indicated a significant stroke risk."


Summaries of

Clark v. Rachfal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2022
210 A.D.3d 1456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Clark v. Rachfal

Case Details

Full title:Geraldine CLARK and Moses Clark, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

210 A.D.3d 1456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
176 N.Y.S.3d 500