From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Rachfal

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Jul 21, 2021
No. 2021-69294 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2021-69295 Motion CA 21-00235

07-21-2021

GERALDINE CLARK, AND MOSES CLARK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, v. STEPHAN J. RACHFAL, M.D., DEFENDANT, JOHN CUCINOTTA, M.D., CROUSE RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, CROUSE HOSPITAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE DEPARTMENT, CROUSE HEALTH HOSPITAL, INC. AND KRISTA J. KANDEL, M.D., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

Plaintiffs having moved for an extension of time to perfect the appeals taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, entered February 2, 2021, and having moved to consolidate the appeals, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is hereby ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks an extension to perfect the appeals is granted, the time to perfect the appeals is extended to October 22, 2021, and, in the event of failure to so perfect, the appeal is hereby dismissed without further order, and

It is further ORDERED that the motion insofar as it seeks to consolidate plaintiffs' appeals is dismissed as unnecessary (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [f] [2]).


Summaries of

Clark v. Rachfal

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Jul 21, 2021
No. 2021-69294 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. Rachfal

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE CLARK, AND MOSES CLARK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-69294 (N.Y. App. Div. Jul. 21, 2021)