Clark v. Quarterman

Full title: NORRIS CLARK, Applicant, v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Mar 17, 2009

NO. 4:08-CV-601-A (N.D. Tex. Mar. 17, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 4:08-CV-601-A.

March 17, 2009

ORDER

JOHN McBRYDE, District Judge

Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Norris Clark is applicant and Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, is respondent.¹ This is an application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 17, 2009, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation, and ordered that the parties file objections, if any thereto, by March 10, 2009. Copies of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation were sent to applicant and respondent. Because timely objections have not been filed, the court accepts the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore,

1 Applicant refers to his application as "petition" and to himself as "petitioner." Consistent with the language of 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the court uses the terms "applicant" and "application" instead of "petitioner" and "petition."

The court ORDERS that the application be, and is hereby, dismissed as time-barred.