From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 12, 1985

Appeal from the Allegany County Court, Sprague, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Denman, Green, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly found Pine Hill Homes, Inc. and Floyd Reynolds jointly and severely liable for their failure to construct plaintiff's home in a workmanlike manner. This was not, as Reynolds contends, an action for breach of contract. Plaintiff's case was pleaded and tried on the theory that Reynolds was negligent in the performance and supervision of the work of constructing plaintiff's home and that his negligence resulted in unworkmanlike construction for which he should be held personally liable. The general rule is that an officer of a corporation who participates in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable therefor. A corporate officer is not held liable for the negligence of the corporation merely because of his official relationship to it. It must be shown that the officer was a participant in the wrongful conduct ( Matter of State of New York v. Daro Chartours, 72 A.D.2d 872, 873; Cleland v Fort Ticonderoga Assn., 71 A.D.2d 740; Bailey v. Baker's Air Force Gas Corp., 50 A.D.2d 129; La Lumia v. Schwartz, 23 A.D.2d 668; Michaels v. Lispenard Holding Corp., 11 A.D.2d 12; 3A Fletcher, Cyclopedia of Private Corporations § 1137 [rev permanent ed 1975]; 15 N.Y. Jur 2d, Business Relationships, §§ 1076, 1086). The evidence at trial established, and indeed Reynolds himself testified, that he supervised the construction of the basement drainage system, that he checked the drain tile after it was laid, was present when it was covered with gravel, and was also present when the chimney was being constructed. He admitted further that he had personally done some of the work. Since he personally supervised or participated in the negligent conduct which gave rise to plaintiff's damages, it was not error for the court to hold him individually liable.


Summaries of

Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AVORY L. CLARK, Respondent, v. PINE HILL HOMES, INC., et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Wise v. Greenwald

enwald was hired by the corporation, that the act of hiring another dentist does not constitute the…

Westminster Construction Co., Inc. v. Sherman

The Supreme Court granted the respondent's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint for its failure to…