From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Perrin

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 29, 1969
170 S.E.2d 236 (Ga. 1969)

Opinion

25349.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 8, 1969.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1969.

Complaint for land. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Kennedy.

H. William Sams, Jr., for appellant.

Hull, Towill Norman, Robert N. Willis, Patrick J. Rice, for appellees.


The appeal in this case is from an order of the trial court denying the plaintiff's motion for a summary judgment. A proper certificate of appealability is included in the record. Four grounds of error are enumerated. The record consists of 140 pages of typewritten material. There are no citations contained in the brief of counsel for the appellant of the part or parts of the record showing jurisdiction of this court to entertain the appeal nor are there any citations contained in the brief referring to the parts of the record (no transcript is included) relied upon in support of the errors enumerated or necessary for the consideration thereof. There being a complete failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 16 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, none of the errors enumerated can be passed upon by this court and the judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed. Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577 ( 156 S.E.2d 904); Wallis v. Maddox, 223 Ga. 626 ( 157 S.E.2d 456).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 8, 1969 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1969.


Summaries of

Clark v. Perrin

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 29, 1969
170 S.E.2d 236 (Ga. 1969)
Case details for

Clark v. Perrin

Case Details

Full title:CLARK v. PERRIN et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 29, 1969

Citations

170 S.E.2d 236 (Ga. 1969)
170 S.E.2d 236

Citing Cases

Watts v. Mitchell

Also, there are no citations of authorities, as is required by Rule 16 (4). There being a failure to comply…

Chambers v. Donalson

Neither the enumeration of errors nor the brief of the appellant refers to the pages in the transcript…