From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Ortega

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Aug 23, 2017
57 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-23-2017

In re Norma CAMPUSANO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Corey ORTEGA, Gricel Orit–Thompson, Saundra E. Saunders, Respondents–Appellants, The Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondent.

Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants. Arthur W. Greig, New York, for respondent.


Martin E. Connor, Brooklyn, for appellants.

Arthur W. Greig, New York, for respondent.

Judgement, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered on or about August 11, 2017 unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petition as supplemented by the schedule, filed and served on respondent on the return date of the order to show cause, gave detailed and timely notice of the specific signatures that petitioner was claiming had been erroneously invalidated by the Board of Elections ( Election Law § 16–102 ).

GISCHE, J.P., RICHTER, KAPNICK, WEBBER, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. Ortega

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Aug 23, 2017
57 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Clark v. Ortega

Case Details

Full title:In re Daniel N. CLARK, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Corey ORTEGA, Gricel…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 23, 2017

Citations

57 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)