From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Nevans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 14, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS.

November 14, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 16, 2007, are adopted in full.
2. Plaintiff is declared a vexatious litigant.
3. The following pre-filing order is entered:
A. Plaintiff is prohibited from raising in this court any claims relating to her workers' compensation dispute, including claims of conspiracy related thereto, and plaintiff is precluded from naming as defendants Carrie Nevans, Dennis Hershewe, Thomas Mostert, Adventist Health System/West, David N. Glaser, M.D., Destie Overpeck, David Wolf and Robert Norton. Plaintiff is directed not to attempt to base her claims on other federal authority, i.e., under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, the Civil Rights Act, or via constitutional challenges, in an attempt to circumvent this pre-filing order.
B. Plaintiff is directed to submit a pre-filing request to the duty judge of this court to consider any new federal claims unrelated to plaintiff's workers' compensation dispute. Plaintiff is directed to include with any pre-filing request a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that the claims raised in her pre-filing request are unrelated to her workers' compensation dispute. Plaintiff be required to obtain a court order granting her permission to proceed with such unrelated claims prior to filing such claims in this court.
4. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Clark v. Nevans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 14, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Clark v. Nevans

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CARRIE NEVANS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 14, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1086 FCD KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2007)