From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Maisen

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 26, 1927
32 N.M. 246 (N.M. 1927)

Opinion

No. 3187.

January 26, 1927

Appeal from District Court, Bernalillo County, Helmick, Judge.

John Baron Burg and J. Lewis Clark, both of Albuquerque, for appellant.

Simms Botts, of Albuquerque, for appellee.


OPINION OF THE COURT


[1] A motion is presented to strike from the transcript the special findings given and refused, and a paper entitled "Statement of Facts,"

4CJ p. 159 n. 62. [2] 4CJ p. 443 n. 44. [3] 4CJ p. 505 n. 84. upon the ground that they are not a part of the record proper and are not included in any bill of exceptions. The findings and conclusions of the trial court, made and refused, are not a part of the record proper, unless ordered by the court to be filed with the clerk, which was not done. Gradi v. Bachechi, 24 N.M. 100, 172 P. 188.

[2] The statement of facts, so called, is a paper filed by appellant in the clerk's office, and appearing in the transcript, having no authenticity whatever, was never passed on by the judge, and was never made a part of the record by any order of the district court. This paper cannot be considered by us. Loftus v. Johnson, 23 N.M. 546, 170 P. 49.

[3] It follows that the motion to strike the two papers mentioned should be granted, and it is so ordered.

BICKLEY and WATSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Clark v. Maisen

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jan 26, 1927
32 N.M. 246 (N.M. 1927)
Case details for

Clark v. Maisen

Case Details

Full title:CLARK v. MAISEN

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Jan 26, 1927

Citations

32 N.M. 246 (N.M. 1927)
255 P. 404

Citing Cases

Vosburg v. Carter

No objections were made as to any irregularity in the filing of the same, as to the time thereof or…

Martin v. Village of Hot Springs

Appellee contends that none of said papers are a part of the record proper, and have been improperly included…