From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Legal Aid of Northwest Texas

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 17, 2005
3:05-CV-1583-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2005)

Opinion

3:05-CV-1583-L.

October 17, 2005


FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and an order of the District Court in implementation thereof, this case has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge. The findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are as follows:

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Type of Case: This is an unspecified civil action.

Parties: Plaintiff is a resident of Dallas, Texas. Defendant is Legal Aid of Northwest Texas. No process has been issued in this case.

Findings and Conclusions: On August 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued a notice of deficiency and order to Plaintiff. The order notified Plaintiff that the complaint failed to comply with Rule 8(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and ordered her to submit an amended complaint, which complies with Rule 8(a), within thirty days. The order cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute. As of the date of this recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the August 17, 2005 order.

Rule 41(b), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, allows a court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the federal rules or any court order. Larson v. Scott, 157 F.3d 1030, 1031 (5th Cir. 1998). "This authority [under Rule 41(b)] flows from the court's inherent power to control its docket and prevent undue delays in the disposition of pending cases." Boudwin v. Graystone Ins. Co., Ltd., 756 F.2d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962)).

Plaintiff has been given ample opportunity to submit an amended complaint in compliance with Rule 8(a). She has refused or declined to do so. Therefore, this action should be dismissed for want of prosecution.

RECOMMENDATION:

For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

A copy of this recommendation will be mailed to Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Clark v. Legal Aid of Northwest Texas

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 17, 2005
3:05-CV-1583-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Clark v. Legal Aid of Northwest Texas

Case Details

Full title:ROSA L. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AID OF NORTHWEST TEXAS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

3:05-CV-1583-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 17, 2005)