From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2017
Case No. CV 16-1087-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-1087-RSWL (JEM)

09-26-2017

MICHAEL LUBAHN CLARK, Petitioner, v. S. HATTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: September 26, 2017

s/ RONALD S.W. LEW

RONALD S.W. LEW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Clark v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 26, 2017
Case No. CV 16-1087-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

Clark v. Hatton

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LUBAHN CLARK, Petitioner, v. S. HATTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-1087-RSWL (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2017)