From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Dep't of Revenue

OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
May 9, 2012
TC-MD 120157N (Or. T.C. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

TC-MD 120157N

05-09-2012

DALE R. CLARK and CATHY M. CLARK, Plaintiffs v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


DECISION OF DISMISSAL

ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE PRO TEMPORE

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Motion) on the ground that Plaintiffs failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2).

A case management conference was held in this matter on May 8, 2012, during which Dale Clark (Clark) appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs and Kyle Quiring (Quiring) appeared on behalf of Defendant. Clark stated that Plaintiffs timely filed a complaint form with the court in October 2011, but the complaint was returned because Plaintiffs did not include the correct filing fee of $240. Clark agreed that Plaintiffs' Complaint, including the correct filing fee, was not filed within 90 days of Defendant's Notice of NSF Check Penalty, dated July 13, 2011. Quiring stated that Plaintiffs could appeal to the Magistrate Division within two years “after the penalty has been paid in full” pursuant to ORS 305.280(3). (Def's Mot at 2.)

A review of court records reveals that the court received from Plaintiffs a complaint form with a $75.00 check on October 12, 2011. On October 17, 2011, the court sent a letter to Plaintiffs stating that Plaintiffs' “Complaint was received with a check for $75.00, which is an insufficient filing fee.” The court's letter further stated that, “[t]o file a valid appeal with the Magistrate Division, a Complaint form must be completed and returned with the document being appealed and the required fee of $240.00 .” See also ORS 305.490(1); Or Laws 2011, Ch 595, §§ 8, 62. It appears that Plaintiffs attempted to file their complaint on October 12, 2011, but did not include the correct filing fee. A complaint is not filed until the appropriate fee or a complete fee waiver application is received. Plaintiffs' Complaint was not filed until March 27, 2012. That interval is longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2) (2011), which provides:

“An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. An appeal from a proposed adjustment under ORS 305.270 shall be filed within 90 days after the date the notice of adjustment is final.”

The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted and Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed.


Summaries of

Clark v. Dep't of Revenue

OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax
May 9, 2012
TC-MD 120157N (Or. T.C. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Clark v. Dep't of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DALE R. CLARK and CATHY M. CLARK Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE…

Court:OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

TC-MD 120157N (Or. T.C. May. 9, 2012)