From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:20-cv-0432 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-0432 AC P

06-15-2021

ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed April 28, 2021, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id at 6. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within twenty-one days of the service of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without further warning.


Summaries of

Clark v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 15, 2021
2:20-cv-0432 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-0432 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2021)