From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 4, 2021
No. 18021-18L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 4, 2021)

Opinion

18021-18L

06-04-2021

MAURICE A. CLARK, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent


ORDER

Courtney D. Jones Judge

In this collection due process (CDP) case, petitioner seeks review pursuant to section 6330(d)(1) of a determination by the Office of Appeals of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to proceed with a proposed levy action to collect his unpaid Federal income tax liability for the taxable year 2014. On October 21, 2020, respondent moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121, contending that there are no disputes of material fact and judgment may be rendered as a matter of law.

Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

On October 17, 2016, the IRS sent, via certified mail, a notice of deficiency for taxable year 2014 to petitioner at his last known address. Petitioner claims that he did not receive the notice of deficiency. Accordingly, petitioner's denial of receipt of the notice raises an issue of material fact sufficient to require the denial of respondent's motion. See Allen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2016-13, at *4 (citing Garrett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-228).

Upon due consideration and for cause, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion for summary judgment, filed October 21, 2020, is denied.


Summaries of

Clark v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 4, 2021
No. 18021-18L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE A. CLARK, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 4, 2021

Citations

No. 18021-18L (U.S.T.C. Jun. 4, 2021)