From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:19-cv-00171-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00171-JAM-EFB

12-28-2021

STEPHEN CLARK; SE'QUETTE CLARK; A.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, RAJNEESH MANNI, C.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, RAJNEESH MANNI; SEQUITY EDDY THOMPSON; and TOMMY LEE THOMPSON Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, TERRENCE MERCADEL; JARED ROBINET; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney CHANCE L. TRIMM, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SACRAMENTO, TERRENCE MERCADAL and JARED ROBINET


SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney CHANCE L. TRIMM, Senior Deputy City Attorney, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SACRAMENTO, TERRENCE MERCADAL and JARED ROBINET

ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF RELATING TO EXPERT WITNESSES

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The parties having stipulated, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Stipulation to extend the discovery deadline relating to expert witnesses is hereby GRANTED.

The schedule set forth in the Civil Trial Scheduling Order [Doc. # 67], is modified as follows:

EVENT CURRENT PROPOSED

Discovery cut-off for Expert Witnesses: 1/14/22 3/14/22

All other pre-trial and trial dates remain in effect.


Summaries of

Clark v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 28, 2021
2:19-cv-00171-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN CLARK; SE'QUETTE CLARK; A.C., a minor, by and through his Guardian…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-00171-JAM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)