From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. City of Chesapeake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Aug 26, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV454-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:19CV454-HEH

08-26-2019

ERIC T. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA SHERIFF OFFICE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

On June 26, 2019, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. By Memorandum Order entered on July 24, 2019, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee of $12.37 or state under penalty of perjury that he did not have sufficient assets to pay such a fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff has neither paid the initial partial filing fee nor averred that he cannot pay such a fee. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's disregard of the Court's directives warrants dismissal of the action. Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: August 26, 2019
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Clark v. City of Chesapeake

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Aug 26, 2019
Civil Action No. 3:19CV454-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Clark v. City of Chesapeake

Case Details

Full title:ERIC T. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA SHERIFF OFFICE, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Aug 26, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:19CV454-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2019)