From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Casino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-01948-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-01948-CMK.

October 31, 2011

James A. Curtis, Bar No. 70538, [Counsel for Service], Christian M. Curtis, Bar No. 270918, SHINE COMPTON, APC, Grass Valley, California.

Howard G. Curtis, Bar No. 79015, LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD G. CURTIS, Cotati, California, Attorneys for Defendants, CHRISTOPHER BENSON and RICHARD KNOX.


ORDER


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to stipulation of all parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), that the above-captioned action, including all claims for relief and causes of action therein is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all parties, with each party bearing their own attorneys' fees and cost of suit herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 10/28/2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF NEVADA ) I am employed in the County of Nevada, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is Shine Compton, APC, 131 South Auburn Street, Suite 203, Grass Valley, California, 95945.

On October 19, 2011, I served the foregoing document described as PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AS TO ALL PARTIES, on all interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in sealed envelopes, addressed as stated on the attached Service List:

[X] BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the ordinary business practices of Shine Compton, APC for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing by U.S. Postal Service. I deposited such envelope(s) in the mail at Grass Valley, California. The envelope(s) was/were mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was made.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I have executed this document on October 19, 2011, at Grass Valley, California./s/Keelynn B. Beutler Roger Clark v. Rolling Hills Casino, et al. Plaintiff, in pro se

Keelynn B. Beutler SERVICE LIST: 2:09-CV-1948-CMK Roger Clark P.O. Box 8593 Red Bluff, CA 96080


Summaries of

Clark v. Casino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. 2:09-cv-01948-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. Casino

Case Details

Full title:ROGER CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ROLLING HILLS CASINO, COUNTY OF TEHAMA, TEHAMA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-01948-CMK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)