From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Casino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK.

January 28, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On November 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 1, 2010, are adopted in full;

2. The County of Tehama, the Tehama County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff Clay Parker are dismissed from this action; and

3. This case proceeds against the remaining defendants only.

DATED: January 27, 2011


Summaries of

Clark v. Casino

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. Casino

Case Details

Full title:ROGER CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ROLLING HILLS CASINO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1948-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2011)