From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 14, 2011
NO. 09-718-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 09-718-JJB-CN

09-14-2011

PHILLIP CLARK (#107322) v. WARDEN BURL CAIN, ET AL.


CIVIL ACTION

RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland dated August 25, 2011 (doc. no. 12) to which no objection has been filed.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 11) is GRANTED, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against the defendants, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U.S.C. §1997e, but with prejudice to his refiling of the same claim or claims in forma pauperis.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 14, 2011.

JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Clark v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 14, 2011
NO. 09-718-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP CLARK (#107322) v. WARDEN BURL CAIN, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

NO. 09-718-JJB-CN (M.D. La. Sep. 14, 2011)