From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Brazelton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 22, 2015
Case No. CV 13-4206-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-4206-FMO (LAL)

04-22-2015

GREGORY DEE CLARK, Petitioner, v. PD BRAZELTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections generally lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;



2. Judgment by entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: April 22, 2015

/s /_________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003).


Summaries of

Clark v. Brazelton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 22, 2015
Case No. CV 13-4206-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Clark v. Brazelton

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY DEE CLARK, Petitioner, v. PD BRAZELTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 22, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-4206-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2015)