From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Blanco

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 21, 2016
NUMBER 13-16-00478-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2016)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00478-CV

12-21-2016

SHARKERIA CLARK, Appellant, v. MAURICIO P. BLANCO AND VERONICA R. ARRELLANO, Appellees.


On appeal from the 135th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes
Memorandum OpinionPer Curiam

Appellant, Sharkeria Clark, appealed a judgment entered by the 135th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas. On September 16, 2016 and November 4, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $205.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $205.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 21st day of December, 2016.


Summaries of

Clark v. Blanco

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Dec 21, 2016
NUMBER 13-16-00478-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Clark v. Blanco

Case Details

Full title:SHARKERIA CLARK, Appellant, v. MAURICIO P. BLANCO AND VERONICA R…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Dec 21, 2016

Citations

NUMBER 13-16-00478-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 21, 2016)

Citing Cases

Clark v. Blanco

This Court previously issued a memorandum opinion dismissing this cause of action. See Clark v. Blanco, No.…