From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene
Jul 19, 2010
Civil No. 08-1418-TC (D. Or. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-1418-TC.

July 19, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 17, 2010. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principlesde novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. This case is remanded for further proceedings according to the findings of this court.


Summaries of

Clark v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene
Jul 19, 2010
Civil No. 08-1418-TC (D. Or. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Clark v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JANICE CLARK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 08-1418-TC (D. Or. Jul. 19, 2010)