From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Nov 15, 2011
No. CV-10-397-JPH (E.D. Wash. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-10-397-JPH.

November 15, 2011.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR REMAND


BEFORE THE COURT is the parties’ stipulated motion to remand this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings ( ECF No. 25 ). Maureen J. Rosette represents plaintiff. Special Assistant United States Attorney Debra J. Meachum represents defendant. The parties have consented to proceed before a magistrate judge (ECF No. 7).

After considering the stipulated motion (ECF No. 25), IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The case is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. On remand the ALJ will:

1. conduct a supplemental hearing, if necessary.

2. further evaluate Plaintiff’s back impairment;

3. further evaluate and explain the weight given to the opinion the PA at Tr. 760;

4. reassess plaintiff’s RFC in light of the entire record, including any additional evidence received; and

5. if necessary, obtain vocational expert testimony.

The Appeals Council also notes that the claimant filed a subsequent application for disability benefits on June 23, 2011, which was denied initially and is currently pending appeal. The Appeals Council recommends that Plaintiff’s subsequent claim be consolidated with the pending claim upon remand.

Because this remand is pursuant to sentence four with a remand to the Commissioner for further proceedings ( see Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991)), plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (a), (d), upon proper request to this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

1. The parties’ stipulated motion for an order of remand pursuant to sentence four (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff’s subsequent application for disability benefits filed on June 23, 2011, currently pending appeal, is consolidated with the pending claim upon remand.

3. Judgment shall be entered for PLAINTIFF.

4. An application for attorney fees and costs may be filed by separate motion.

5. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order, enter judgment, forward copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Clark v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Washington
Nov 15, 2011
No. CV-10-397-JPH (E.D. Wash. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Clark v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CLARK v. ASTRUE

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Washington

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

No. CV-10-397-JPH (E.D. Wash. Nov. 15, 2011)