From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Clark v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 11, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

531908

03-11-2021

In the Matter of Willie CLARK, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Willie Clark, Alden, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.


Willie Clark, Alden, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lynch, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination that found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Louime v. Venettozzi, 186 A.D.3d 1870, 1871, 129 N.Y.S.3d 351 [2020] ; Matter of Kennedy v. Annucci, 185 A.D.3d 1372, 1373, 126 N.Y.S.3d 423 [2020] ). Inasmuch as the record does not reflect that the mandatory $5 surcharge was refunded to petitioner's account (see 7 NYCRR 253.7 [b]), he should be permitted to recoup that expense (see Matter of Dibble v. Venettozzi, 181 A.D.3d 1139, 1139, 118 N.Y.S.3d 449 [2020] ). As the record does reflect that petitioner has paid a filing fee of $305, and he has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount.

Lynch, J.P., Aarons, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur. ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $305.


Summaries of

Clark v. Annucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 11, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Clark v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Willie Clark, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. Annucci, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 11, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
192 A.D.3d 1317
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1471